Trademark registration is a vital step for businesses to protect their brand identity, but the journey doesn't end with merely filing an application. Continuous and extensive usage of a trademark plays a crucial role in securing its registration. In fact, these factors can significantly affect the decision-making process in trademark offices and courts. In this blog, we will explore how continuous and extensive usage of a trademark affects its registration, with examples of successful trademark registrations, relevant legal judgments, and the consequences of non-usage marks.
Continuous usage of a trademark refers to the uninterrupted and consistent use of a mark in commerce for a prolonged period. This usage demonstrates that the trademark has been actively used in connection with the goods or services it represents. Continuous usage can strengthen a trademark owner's claim for registration, especially in cases where there might be objections or oppositions.
The logic behind continuous usage is that it reflects the goodwill, reputation, and recognition the trademark has earned over time. A trademark that has been continuously used becomes strongly associated with its owner and the products or services it represents.
Continuous usage of a trademark can have a significant effect on its registration. In many cases, trademark offices may question whether a mark is distinctive enough to be registered. Continuous usage can help overcome such objections. This is because, through sustained use, the mark may have acquired distinctiveness in the marketplace, even if it lacked inherent distinctiveness at the time of filing.
For example, a descriptive or non-distinctive mark might initially face hurdles in registration. However, if it can be proven that the mark has been continuously used over a long period, gaining recognition and goodwill among consumers, this evidence can be pivotal in securing its registration.
1. **AMUL** – The brand name "Amul," associated with dairy products, has been in continuous use since 1955. Its widespread recognition and consistent use helped the brand overcome potential objections, leading to its successful registration.
2. **BATA** – Bata, a global footwear brand, continuously used its trademark in India since the 1930s. This extensive history played a key role in ensuring its registration and defense against infringement claims.
3. **NIKE** – Despite facing initial challenges in various jurisdictions, continuous use of the Nike trademark since 1971, particularly in India, led to its successful registration after proving acquired distinctiveness.
4. **ITC** – The continuous use of ITC's name and logo in the Indian market since the 1970s helped the company secure trademark registration even when opposed by competitors.
5. **Haldiram's** – Haldiram's, a brand synonymous with Indian snacks, relied on the continuous usage of its mark for over five decades, which led to successful registration in India and globally.
1. **Cadila Healthcare Ltd. v. Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (2001)** – The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of continuous usage in determining the distinctiveness of a trademark, holding that long-term usage creates goodwill, thus making a case for registration.
2. **S. Syed Mohideen v. P. Sulochana Bai (2016)** – The Supreme Court acknowledged that continuous use of a trademark builds goodwill and reputation, which can be vital for defending against infringement and gaining registration.
3. **Milmet Oftho Industries v. Allergan Inc. (2004)** – The Supreme Court ruled that continuous usage of a mark can establish prior use, thereby favoring registration and protection over later applications.
Extensive usage of a trademark refers to the widespread and prominent use of the mark across a broad spectrum of media, regions, or product lines. Extensive usage helps build strong brand recognition and can support claims of acquired distinctiveness. This usage is particularly important when a mark may be seen as descriptive, generic, or lacking inherent distinctiveness.
Extensive usage strengthens a trademark's claim to distinctiveness. Even a common or descriptive term can acquire a secondary meaning if used extensively in association with particular goods or services. Trademark authorities are more likely to grant registration when the applicant can show that the mark is known and recognized by the public due to its extensive usage.
Moreover, extensive usage can overcome objections related to the likelihood of confusion, descriptiveness, or non-distinctiveness. For example, if two companies use similar marks, but one can demonstrate extensive and widespread use, it will have a stronger claim to registration.
1. **Google** – The trademark "Google" is extensively used across various platforms and services, and this extensive usage has ensured its successful registration despite it initially being a generic term.
2. **McDonald's** – Extensive usage of the "Golden Arches" and brand name "McDonald's" in India has played a significant role in protecting the mark from infringement and ensuring its successful registration.
3. **ZARA** – The extensive global usage of the ZARA brand for fashion and retail services has led to successful registrations in multiple jurisdictions, including India.
4. **Amazon** – The extensive use of the Amazon brand name in e-commerce and web services helped the company successfully register its trademark, even in the face of challenges.
5. **Tata** – Tata’s extensive usage of its name across industries such as automotive, steel, and telecommunications has solidified its trademark registration in India and worldwide.
1. **Godfrey Philips India Ltd. v. Girnar Food & Beverages (2004)** – The Supreme Court held that extensive usage and advertisement of a trademark are crucial factors in determining its registration and distinctiveness.
2. **Procter & Gamble Manufacturing (Tianjin) Co. Ltd. v. Anchor Health & Beauty Care Pvt. Ltd. (2014)** – The Delhi High Court held that extensive usage of the "Whisper" brand by Procter & Gamble for sanitary napkins gave the brand secondary meaning, supporting its registration.
3. **Nestle India Ltd. v. Mood Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. (2013)** – The Delhi High Court emphasized that extensive usage and commercial success are strong factors in overcoming objections to the registration of a trademark.
On the other hand, trademarks that are not in use or are only "proposed to be used" often face challenges during the registration process. Without evidence of usage, trademark authorities may question whether the mark is distinctive or if it can actually serve the purpose of distinguishing the applicant's goods or services from others.
1. **Lack of Distinctiveness** – Proposed-to-be-used marks may lack the acquired distinctiveness that comes from being actively used in commerce.
2. **Higher Risk of Objections** – Trademark authorities and competitors may file objections, arguing that the mark is either too descriptive, generic, or confusingly similar to other registered trademarks.
3. **Difficulty in Proving Prior Use** – In the case of a conflict with another trademark, a non-usage mark may struggle to prove prior use, leading to possible rejection of the application.
In conclusion, continuous and extensive usage of a trademark plays a pivotal role in its registration and protection. Both forms of usage contribute to a trademark's distinctiveness, build goodwill, and help overcome objections. On the other hand, non-usage or proposed-to-be-used marks often face more challenges, as they lack the commercial recognition needed to justify registration. As evidenced by the numerous examples and legal precedents, continuous and extensive usage is a powerful tool for securing trademark rights and ensuring brand protection.
Copyright © 2025-Business Mitra Business Mitra - All right reserved | Managed by Hyproweb