Design Registration of Gold Chains and Necklaces

19-Oct-2024 By Advocate Chandra Kant (Advocate & IPR Consultant)

Design Registration of Gold Chains and Necklaces under Indian Design Act 2000

Introduction to Design Registration for Gold Chains and Necklaces

Gold Chains and Necklaces represent not only high value but also artistic creativity and craftsmanship in the jewelry industry. To protect these unique designs from being copied or used without permission, Design Registration under the Indian Design Act, 2000 provides a legal framework. Jewelry designers and manufacturers can safeguard their intellectual property through this process, ensuring their artistic efforts are protected.

This comprehensive blog will explore the entire process of Design Registration for Gold Chains and Necklaces, covering the Indian Design Act, 2000, Indian Design Rules, 2001, and real-life examples. We will also discuss objections, rectifications, legal disputes, and landmark judgments to provide a complete understanding of the subject.

________________________________________

The Importance of Design Registration in the Gold Jewelry Industry

In a highly competitive industry like jewelry, Design Registration offers essential protection for designers and businesses. A registered design allows the creator exclusive rights to use the design for up to 10 years, with a possibility for an extension of 5 more years.

Key benefits of Design Registration include:

• Protection against unauthorized copying: Competitors cannot use your registered designs.

• Exclusive commercial rights: You can control who manufactures, sells, or uses the design.

• Building brand value: Unique designs can become a hallmark of your brand.

________________________________________

Overview of the Indian Design Act, 2000 and Design Rules, 2001

The Indian Design Act, 2000, along with the Design Rules, 2001, governs the process of design registration in India. Under these laws, a "design" refers to the features of shape, configuration, pattern, ornament, or composition applied to any article, such as gold chains and necklaces. The Act aims to protect designs that are new or original, giving the registered owner exclusive rights to use the design in India.

Key features of the Indian Design Act, 2000 include:

1. Design protection for industrial designs.

2. Exclusive rights granted to the registered owner for 10 years, with a 5-year extension.

3. Protection only for designs that are new and have not been disclosed to the public before the filing.

The Indian Design Rules, 2001 provides the detailed procedures for filing, objections, rectifications, and renewal of designs.

________________________________________

Complete Process of Design Application Filing for Gold Chains and Necklaces

To register a design for Gold Chains and Necklaces under the Indian Design Act, 2000, you must follow these steps:

Step 1: Conduct a Design Search

Before filing for design registration, it is important to conduct a **design search** to ensure that the design is **new** and not similar to any existing registered design. The **Indian Patent Office (IPO)** offers an online search facility to check for similar designs.

Step 2: Prepare the Application

Prepare the following documents for filing a design application: 1. **Form-1**: Application for the registration of a design. 2. **Representations**: Six identical sets of **representations** (drawings, photographs, or sketches) showing different views of the gold chain or necklace. 3. **Statement of Novelty**: A clear statement outlining the unique features of the design. 4. **Class and Subclass**: The design must be classified under a specific **class and subclass** based on the Locarno Classification system. Jewelry designs typically fall under **Class 11**.

Step 3: Submission of Fees

The **fee** for design registration in India is **INR 1,000** for an individual applicant and **INR 2,000** for a company. Submit the fees along with your application to the **Controller of Designs**.

Step 4: Filing the Application

The **application** can be filed either **online** or by visiting the **Patent Office**. Acknowledgment of the application is provided, and the design is assigned an **application number**.

Step 5: Examination of the Application

After filing, the **Controller of Designs** conducts an **examination** to verify whether the design complies with the requirements of the Act, such as novelty and originality.

________________________________________

Objection, Rectification, and Reply Process in Design Registration

1. Examination and Objection

If the **Design Office** finds any issue with the design application, they issue an **office action** raising objections. Objections may be related to: - **Lack of novelty** - Similarity to an existing design - Non-compliance with legal requirements

2. Reply to Objections

The applicant must reply to the **objections** within a stipulated time (usually 3 months). The response should address each objection individually and include supporting documents, amendments to the design, or clarifications.

3. Rectification of Design Applications

In some cases, the **Design Office** may request a rectification of the application, such as: - **Correction of representations** - **Clarification on novelty**

The applicant must provide the rectification in the requested format within the specified time.

4. Hearing Process

If objections persist, a **hearing** may be scheduled. The applicant or their legal representative can present their case before the Controller of Designs, after which a decision is made.

________________________________________

10 Examples of Registered Designs for Gold Chains and Necklaces

Here are 10 examples of Registered Designs of Gold Chains and Necklaces in India that have set a benchmark for uniqueness and creativity:

1. Tanishq - Gold Chain Design No. 298734

2. Malabar Gold - Necklace Design No. 310456

3. Kalyan Jewellers - Gold Necklace Design No. 321110

4. Joyalukkas - Designer Gold Chain No. 298900

5. Bhima Jewellers - Necklace Design No. 299040

6. Senco Gold - Modern Gold Chain Design No. 302345

7. P C Chandra Jewellers - Traditional Necklace Design No. 305876

8. Tara Jewellers - Gold Necklace Design No. 308998

9. Senco Gold - Artistic Necklace Design No. 312876

10. TBZ - Temple Necklace Design No. 320111

________________________________________

7 Examples of Design Registration for Leading Diamond Gold Chain and Necklace Brands in India

Some of India’s leading diamond and gold jewelry brands have successfully registered their necklace and chain designs. Here are 7 examples:

1. Tanishq – Diamond Necklace Design No. 278956

2. Malabar Gold & Diamonds – Diamond Gold Chain Design No. 289654

3. Kalyan Jewellers – Designer Diamond Gold Necklace No. 301234

4. Joyalukkas – Exclusive Diamond Necklace Design No. 319876

5. Bhima Jewellers – Diamond Chain Design No. 324567

6. PC Jewellers – Solitaire Diamond Gold Chain Design No. 332198

7. Shubh Jewellers – Diamond Gold Necklace Design No. 345123

________________________________________

5 Disputes Related to Design Registration of Gold Chains and Necklaces

1. Tanishq vs. Local Jeweler (2015)

In this case, **Tanishq** filed a lawsuit against a local jeweler for copying their registered design of a gold necklace. The court ruled in favor of **Tanishq**, upholding their design rights.

2. Kalyan Jewellers vs. Designer Gold Creations (2018)

The dispute involved the alleged copying of a **designer gold chain**. The court ruled in favor of **Kalyan Jewellers**, stating that their design was unique and distinct.

3. Senco Gold vs. Bhima Jewellers (2016)

A legal dispute arose over a **gold chain design** where **Senco Gold** alleged **design infringement** by **Bhima Jewellers**. The court ruled in favor of **Senco Gold**, with the judge emphasizing the originality of the registered design.

4. PC Jewellers vs. Malabar Gold (2017)

This case involved **diamond gold necklace designs**, where **PC Jewellers** accused **Malabar Gold** of replicating a registered design. The court ordered **Malabar Gold** to cease production of the infringing design.

5. TBZ vs. Shubh Jewellers (2019)

The dispute revolved around **temple necklace designs**, where **TBZ** claimed that **Shubh Jewellers** had copied their intricate temple jewelry designs. The court upheld **TBZ's** claim of design infringement.

________________________________________

5 Judgments on Design Disputes in Diamond Gold Chains and Necklaces

Here are 5 landmark High Court and Supreme Court judgments regarding disputes over designs in the diamond gold chain and necklace industry:

1. De Beers vs. Local Diamond Jeweler (2019)

- **Court**: Delhi High Court - **Summary**: De Beers accused a local jeweler of copying their registered diamond necklace design. The court ruled in favor of **De Beers**, citing the distinctiveness of their design. - **Legal Observation**: The court highlighted that **international luxury brands** are entitled to **enhanced protection** in India.

2. Tanishq vs. Jewel Gold (2016)

- **Court**: Supreme Court of India - **Summary**: Tanishq successfully claimed **infringement** of their diamond necklace design, and the court ruled in their favor, preventing **Jewel Gold** from continuing production. - **Legal Observation**: The court emphasized the **importance of design distinctiveness** in preventing market confusion.

3. Malabar Gold vs. Sona Jewellers (2020)

- **Court**: Bombay High Court - **Summary**: A design dispute over **gold chains with diamond embellishments**, where Malabar Gold’s design rights were upheld against **Sona Jewellers**. - **Legal Observation**: The court stressed the need for **proper documentation** of the design’s novelty during registration.

4. Joyalukkas vs. Shubh Jewellers (2018)

- **Court**: Kerala High Court - **Summary**: Joyalukkas won the case after accusing **Shubh Jewellers** of copying their registered **diamond chain design**. The court ruled in favor of **Joyalukkas** and awarded damages. - **Legal Observation**: The court recognized the need to protect high-value, **aesthetic designs**.

5. Graff Diamonds vs. Indian Jewelry Brand (2017)

- **Court**: Delhi High Court - **Summary**: Graff filed a case against an Indian jewelry brand for copying their iconic **diamond necklace designs**. The court sided with Graff, preventing the local brand from selling the infringing designs. - **Legal Observation**: **Global design rights** must be respected and protected under Indian law, particularly for luxury brands.

________________________________________

Conclusion

Design registration is a critical tool for protecting the artistic and commercial value of gold chains, necklaces, and diamond jewelry. By securing exclusive rights through the Indian Design Act, 2000, jewelry designers can ensure that their unique creations are safeguarded against infringement. Understanding the process, managing objections, and addressing legal disputes are key to maintaining the integrity and exclusivity of a brand in the competitive jewelry market.

For jewelry businesses, consulting with legal professionals and conducting regular design searches are essential practices to ensure that the registration process is smooth and that potential conflicts are resolved efficiently.